Let me clarify my dilemma.
It seems to me to be either/or issue when it comes to the validity of the JW org.
Either: The leaders behind the scene are so clever that there exist no eye-witnesss to sins that the Bible states are common amoung all humans making them demonic,
OR
The GB simply does not sin to the extent of the average person, making their claims of righteousness more credible.
Would not one think that in this age of disclosure and "gotcha" mentality that someone would come forth with specific evidence of intentional fraud or duplicity at the top thus, wobbling the entire structure of the group? All we seem to have now are opinions and circumstancial evidence. Perhaps the real eye-witnesses are still under the spell of the cult even though they think they have been liberated. I can't tell ...